<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d9519466\x26blogName\x3dthe+spkydog+koop\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dTAN\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://spkydog.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://spkydog.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-4534400202552370894', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe", messageHandlersFilter: gapi.iframes.CROSS_ORIGIN_IFRAMES_FILTER, messageHandlers: { 'blogger-ping': function() {} } }); } }); </script>

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

Microsoft discontinues...folds... integrates... unveils, and is right on...

For those of you expressing concern that spkydog may have met an untimely demise while chasing the mailman, do relax. We've just been enjoying the waning dog days of summer while we can. Meanwhile, the speech industry keeps chugging along.

Earlier this month, tech journalists reporting on SpeechTek threw us what appeared to be a rather tasty bone when trying to interpret Microsoft's announcements at the conference. Initially, we just about fell out of our koop when reading the first line of an earlier version of this Information Week article which suggested that "Microsoft plans to discontinue selling speech server". After reading on, we understand that Microsoft is folding the Speech Server product into its Office Communication Server 2007 product line. Whew! We certainly wouldn't want to see Speech Server put in the pasture so soon after Microsoft put its weight behind VoiceXML.

There is a bit less hyperbole in the opening lines of this IT Week article, where the development is described as an unveiling of new speech technologies in Office Communication Server 2007. Nevertheless, the author dedicates at least half of the article to commentary on the now infamous speech demo Microsoft gave to financial analysts earlier this summer. Talk about beating a dead horse...

In any case, spkydog thinks Microsoft has made a wise move here, which will likely serve both them and the speech industry quite well. Despite the recent negativity and skepticism Microsoft's demo debacle has drawn, spkydog believes speech technology is more than ready for prime time - on our desktops, in our cars, on our PDA's/mobiles and of course our POTS phones, as usual. The bigger issue is getting the masses accustomed to using speech on a regular basis. Those of you who were introduced to using a mouse on your PC as an adult probably have memories of finding it rather cumbersome the first time. Speaking to machines has the analogous implications, and probably will for some time.

By integrating speech technology as a feature into systems that will be widely used by the masses (e.g., Windows Vista and Office Communication Server) Microsoft is putting speech technology in front of virtually everybody. Management at Acme, Inc. won't have to sit and spend cycles discussing whether or not its time to investing in a speech-enabled version of their favorite applications - its just going to happen. Selling speech technology as a stand-alone enabler is a tough sell.

There are actually very few companies who are in a position to market speech technologies to the masses in the way Microsoft is. Nuance has lots of speech technology, but in terms of apps is limited to the call center. Why buy Dragon when you get almost the same functionality bundled with Office? IBM has lots of apps and a fair amount of speech technology, but you run Microsoft bits on your PC all the time, and IBM bits only part of the time. Google certainly has the application reach, but their speech tech capabilities are not well understood, making them somewhat a wildcard.

In short, the folks in Redmond seem to be on to a decent strategy for differentiating their platforms and applications with speech technology.

6 Comments:

At 7:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Great post. I couldn't agree more and I'm very excited about the opportunities this opens up for speech and speech developers.

GotSpeech was one of the first (if not the first) to break this news and we had lots of good commentary on the announcement.

If your readers are interested in Microsoft's Speech Server then they should check things out over at GotSpeech.Net.

 
At 1:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

MS "put it's weight behind VoiceXML"? You've got to be kidding me. MS did everything it possibly could to kill VoiceXML. Only when it was absolutely clear that MS didn't actually have any weight in the IVR-speech industry did they back off SALT and slap on a vxml front end.

--IndustryInsider

 
At 7:01 PM, Blogger spkydog said...

Ok, you didn't like my euphemism... I was trying to be nice for once. How's this?

"Microsoft figured out the horse it was beating (VoiceXML) was still very much alive. Around the same time they figured out what doctors have been telling us for years. SALT is BAD for your health!"

Nevertheless, Microsoft is including support for VoiceXML, and has also joined the VoiceXML Forum...

 
At 2:59 AM, Blogger Sheth Raxit said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 3:01 AM, Blogger Sheth Raxit said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 3:04 AM, Blogger Sheth Raxit said...

this may be interesting about MSS-SpeechServer, on Opus fewdays ago.


http://opusresearch.net/wordpress/
pdfreports/mss_ag_080806_02.pdf

 

Post a Comment

<< Home